Charting The Sea of Talmud

(4 customer reviews)


In stock

Charting the Sea of Talmud is a revolutionary visual method for understanding and summarizing Talmudic discussions, conclusions, and laws. Through the creation and quick review of simple diagrams, students of Talmud can remember “who said what” – at a glance – and finally gain a clearer picture of the sugya.

SKU: 6188 Category: Tags: , , ,

4 reviews for Charting The Sea of Talmud

  1. Ben Rothke

    After the Chumash (Bible), the Talmud Bavli (Babylonian Talmud) is the most important and central text in Judaism. While the Chumash is generally readily understood by one with a basic understanding of Hebrew; deciphering the Bavli is a formidable challenge that has frustrated many of those who study it.

    With its heavy use of Aramaic, combined almost arbitrarily with Hebrew, lack of any sort of punctuation or formatting, commingled with its extraordinarily terse style; makes grasping and understanding the Bavli a significant endeavor, and an often frustrating one at that for the novice.

    In Charting the Sea of Talmud, Dr. Yisrael Ury, a physicist by profession, has created a system of visual methods for easier understanding and summarization of Talmudic discussions, conclusions and laws.

    Ury writes that the challenge is that understanding the meaning of the words in the Talmud is not always sufficient to understand the meaning of the thought being conveyed. He states that the objective of the book is to introduce his Talmud Diagrams, which simplifies the tracking of connected facts in the Talmud.

    The frustration felt by many who learn the Bavli is often not an issue when using an Artscroll translation, and is not really solved by this book. Where the book provides significant value is by providing a visual aid to assist in deciphering and following the Talmud’s logic. Understanding the logic and logical flows is essential to understanding the Talmud itself. Those that understand the language of the Talmud but not its logic are left with a highly incomplete understanding.

    Since seeing is often synonymous with understanding, the visual process via the Talmud Diagrams is an excellent way to convey information. Many people, if not all, are able to process complex information substantially faster with visual assistance than without.

    Via his diagrams, Ury has created an effective and valuable system that visually represents the underlying logic of the Talmud. That is quite beneficial, since the logic of the Talmud is often the hardest part to understand. The book notes that diagrams become quite helpful when two or more factors determine an outcome, which occurs regularly in the Talmud.

    When one puts two diagrams with the different factors together, it becomes much easier, and immediately clear what the difference between the two are.

    Another advantage of using diagrams and expressing ideas in the language of diagrams is that the Talmudic sugya (topic) can be condensed into a very small space. This makes it much easier to understand the sugya and much easier to remember.

    Ury’s Diagram scheme can be used to represent numerous Talmudic arguments, from basic disagreements, concepts in time, disputes, proofs, refutations and more.

    Ury makes it eminently clear that his diagrams are meant to complement the study of the Talmud, not be a replacement for it. The book is a fantastic reference for those that are looking for an aid in their Talmudic studies, those teaching an introduction to Talmud class, or anyone in between.

    The only issue I have with the book is that at under 150 pages, it may be a bit too brief, and would have been better served had a number of additional examples been given. Additional pages would have been beneficial in that they would have better enabled the reader to determine the appropriate methodology for charting diagrams on their own.

    Readers that want an advanced taste of diagramming can view 4 videos from Ury here.

    Many aids to Talmud study have come out in the last decade. Web sites such as Gemara Sedura and Gemara Berura are invaluable to those that want to develop skills to master the Talmud. Ury’s book is a welcome addition to this trend.

    Those looking to better understand the Talmud will certainly find Charting the Sea of Talmud a worthwhile reference.

  2. Israel Drazin

    The Talmud that was composed and finally edited with late insertions in Babylonia around the seventh century is a staple of learning for many Jews. About a century ago, a rabbi suggested that Jews should read a page daily, front and back, a practice that has been widely accepted. Under this regimen, it takes seven and a half years to complete the entire Babylonian Talmud. I did so twice. The discussions in the Babylonian Talmud are difficult to follow and understand and, as a result, many Jews who piously study the Talmud are reading the text as devout Jews who don’t understand Hebrew read prayers in Hebrew without understanding what they are reading. There is also a Jerusalem Talmud that wasn’t edited well because of persecution when the editing began; it is difficult to study, and not many people do so.

    Great scholars, such as Moses Maimonides (1138-1204) used both Talmuds. Maimonides created his Code of Jewish Law, called Mishneh Torah, and based it on the discussions in the two Talmuds. He suggested that by using his law book there wouldn’t be a need to use either difficult Talmud, but many Jews ignore his advice and study the Talmud, despite its difficulties. Yisrael Ury wrote this book to present his innovative idea of using boxes and directional arrows to chart the discussions of the Babylonian Talmud thereby making it somewhat easier to understand.

    For example, in a rather simple Talmudic discussion where one sage differs with the view of another, Ury suggests drawing two boxes, one uncolored and the second colored. The first represents the view that is not accepted as law, the second the correct opinion. The student should place a directional arrow under the two boxes showing that the law moves from the erroneous to the correct opinion.

    Some readers may find Ury’s suggestion helpful because they will be able to see a diagram. Others may find it simpler to write three lines: X says such and such. Y says such and such. The ruling is as Y says. Another difficulty with Ury’s suggestion is that when more than two sages discuss a matter, the page becomes filled with boxes. Still another problem is that the Talmud generally doesn’t declare whose opinion is correct. Yet, as previously stated, there are people, no doubt, who will find Ury’s suggestion helpful.

  3. Iddo Wernick

    The author is to be applauded for his enormous creativity and vision and skill.

    Indeed he assumes much of the reading public. Perhaps the hard work is reducing the Talmudic discussions to matrices in the first place.

    Even more fundamentally, the view of the physicist is to reduce the system to the minimum number of variables. So many other professions don’t think about it that way at all. Other disciplines (e.g., legal) have hierarchies, but achieving clarity is not always in the interest of the lawyer or politician or businessman. It is always in the interest of the physicist to achieve clarity, and also always in the interest of a trueTalmid Chacham.

  4. Jimmy Stone

    very easy-to-read, user-friendly paperback. beautifully designed. Main thing is of course that the system makes complex talmudic discussions easier to understand and remember.

    highly recommended for (aspiring and experienced) talmud students

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop
    Charting The Sea of Talmud
    Add to cart